“Blood Stained Headlines– the Woolwich Murder and Multicultural Life”
by Professor Les Back, Goldsmiths
The deafening frequency of the sirens on Wednesday night was reminiscent of London after the 7th July bombings as the police cars and vans hurtled down the New Cross Road towards Woolwich.
It is the soundtrack of the “war on terror” and lasted deep into the night.
Against this piercing sonic backdrop the streets remained unnervingly quiet and without people.
Most residents stayed inside watching the news of violence in familiar places unfold on screens via Twitter, Facebook and often last of all the TV news. It was as if South East London was holding its breath.
For good reason, the bloody pornography of Thursday’s newspaper headlines about the murder did not challenge the violence, rather the news coverage was deeply complicit with its cultural politics.
The colour enhanced photographs of the killer’s bloodied hands were the instruments of the chilling and gruesome spectacle.
The Sun went as far as insisting on having its red top brand logo inserted with the still images taken of the mobile phone footage that appeared on the TV news.
The media coverage of the murder did not lessen the nature of the offense, rather it has circulated and profited from it.
Londoners of all shades and backgrounds were confronted by the gratuitous violent images as they stood next to each other on the train platform or in the Underground.
“See the way the media used ‘Caribbean’ and ‘Nigerian’ to describe them,” a young black Londoner said to his friend: “You know what’s coming next don’t you?”
Blurring the categories will create a wider range of targets for the backlash. “It’ll be the Muslims first though. The EDL have already attacked Mosques in Woolwich and Essex,” he concluded.
The violence and the reactions to it will damage the social choreography of London’s multiculture but not fatally.
I am sure plenty of commentators will line up to rehearse another chorus of the familiar pronouncements about the “death of multiculturalism.”
We’ve seen this all before but the reality of life in the city is paradoxical.
For London is both the stage for divisions and violence and also a meeting place where those differences are routinely bridged and made banal.
“I was just thinking today, there was a woman fully veiled walking through the market buying her shopping. It was just ordinary I didn’t even notice her,” said a white neighbour. This captures something about the reality of an everyday, unspectacular co-existence.
The public political response has been little more than a war of clichés and well-rehearsed condolences.
David Cameron spoke of the endurance of the “indomitable British spirit,” and “the belief in freedom, in democracy, in free speech, in our British values, Western values.”
I do not minimise the violence or condone the butchery in Woolwich. This has happened in a moment where British life is increasingly militarised.
The military has had a more prominent presence in everyday life in British society from X Factor, to their presence at sporting occasions, to the perennial collections for Help for Heroes.
These become local traces of the wars that are being fought afar in Afghanistan and Iraq and now targeted as a result.
Politicians will deny that there is any connection between war and the murder.
Equally, connections between the reactions to these tragic events and a re-invigorated racism will be steadfastly rejected.
In both cases what we are seeing is not just “lone-wolf” Jihadism, but also this tragedy is a manifestation of the social damage of war erupting in the very ordinary spaces of British life.
The blood-stained headlines will not be easily forgotten but they will inevitably become yesterday’s news. The rhythm of multicultural life in South East London will re-establish itself and find its balance again.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
“Blood Stained Headlines– the Woolwich Murder
Professor Les Back who blogs at The Conversation
“Blood Stained Headlines– the Woolwich Murder and Multicultural Life”
by Professor Les Back, Goldsmiths
The deafening frequency of the sirens on Wednesday night was reminiscent of London after the 7th July bombings as the police cars and vans hurtled down the New Cross Road towards Woolwich.
It is the soundtrack of the “war on terror” and lasted deep into the night.
Against this piercing sonic backdrop the streets remained unnervingly quiet and without people.
Most residents stayed inside watching the news of violence in familiar places unfold on screens via Twitter, Facebook and often last of all the TV news. It was as if South East London was holding its breath.
For good reason, the bloody pornography of Thursday’s newspaper headlines about the murder did not challenge the violence, rather the news coverage was deeply complicit with its cultural politics.
The colour enhanced photographs of the killer’s bloodied hands were the instruments of the chilling and gruesome spectacle.
The Sun went as far as insisting on having its red top brand logo inserted with the still images taken of the mobile phone footage that appeared on the TV news.
The media coverage of the murder did not lessen the nature of the offense, rather it has circulated and profited from it.
Londoners of all shades and backgrounds were confronted by the gratuitous violent images as they stood next to each other on the train platform or in the Underground.
“See the way the media used ‘Caribbean’ and ‘Nigerian’ to describe them,” a young black Londoner said to his friend: “You know what’s coming next don’t you?”
Blurring the categories will create a wider range of targets for the backlash. “It’ll be the Muslims first though. The EDL have already attacked Mosques in Woolwich and Essex,” he concluded.
The violence and the reactions to it will damage the social choreography of London’s multiculture but not fatally.
I am sure plenty of commentators will line up to rehearse another chorus of the familiar pronouncements about the “death of multiculturalism.”
We’ve seen this all before but the reality of life in the city is paradoxical.
For London is both the stage for divisions and violence and also a meeting place where those differences are routinely bridged and made banal.
“I was just thinking today, there was a woman fully veiled walking through the market buying her shopping. It was just ordinary I didn’t even notice her,” said a white neighbour. This captures something about the reality of an everyday, unspectacular co-existence.
The public political response has been little more than a war of clichés and well-rehearsed condolences.
David Cameron spoke of the endurance of the “indomitable British spirit,” and “the belief in freedom, in democracy, in free speech, in our British values, Western values.”
I do not minimise the violence or condone the butchery in Woolwich. This has happened in a moment where British life is increasingly militarised.
The military has had a more prominent presence in everyday life in British society from X Factor, to their presence at sporting occasions, to the perennial collections for Help for Heroes.
These become local traces of the wars that are being fought afar in Afghanistan and Iraq and now targeted as a result.
Politicians will deny that there is any connection between war and the murder.
Equally, connections between the reactions to these tragic events and a re-invigorated racism will be steadfastly rejected.
In both cases what we are seeing is not just “lone-wolf” Jihadism, but also this tragedy is a manifestation of the social damage of war erupting in the very ordinary spaces of British life.
The blood-stained headlines will not be easily forgotten but they will inevitably become yesterday’s news. The rhythm of multicultural life in South East London will re-establish itself and find its balance again.
Les Back
Twitter @academicdiary
Related Posts
Police release images of men linked to Millwall FA Cup tie disorder
Man pleads guilty to starting fire that destroyed 144 year old Croydon furniture store during London riots
Stabbing after petty dispute on Facebook
Bethnal Green Library, a Hackney housing estate and Whitechapel’s neuron pod shortlisted for architectural awards