This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Headteachers’ job is worth the money
Claire Shaw
The idea that headteachers who earn over £100,000 a year should be “named and shamed” according to Union leader, Chris Keates, is irrational, unnecessary and simply unfair.
The UK press reported this week that there are over 1,000 teachers in the country who are earning more than £100,000 a year, 200 of which are based in London schools.
Out of the highest paid headteachers in London, 17 are from schools in Tower Hamlets – the borough with the second most improved GCSE grades in the country, after Darlington.
For schools situated in a deprived area of London to exceed the GCSE national average for the first time is a significant achievement, one that would have taken a lot of time and effort.
Headteacher, Craig Tunstall, earned £186,203 last year. He successfully improved four failing schools in Lambeth. To suggest Tunstall should be “named and shamed” for helping children gain a good education seems very unreasonable.
Critics argue the increasing number of headteachers earning over £100,000 is putting a strain on school budget pressures, on taxpayers, and local authorities, which are being forced to pay higher wages due to competition.
Over 100 of these ‘over-paid’ heads run academy schools, which are free to pay their staff what they like. But the idea behind academy schools is to raise attainment levels. If this is achieved, then heads should be rewarded with a high wage package.
It is no mean feat to run a school. If Education Secretary, Michael Gove wants to “restrain” what heads get paid, even when a substantial number of schools in the UK have seen big improvements over the last year, he is simply saying that, headteachers do not deserve a good wage for improving the standards of education in the UK.
Headteachers have the high-pressure job of raising education standards in the UK to ensure all children are given a good start to life. A job worth the money.
Related Posts
Science made simple for Kurdish media
Bidders invited for new £10m primary school
Superhead resigns amidst school contracts controversy
Parents protest over revival of academy plan